The Order of the Eucharist

Jim Jordan has an excellent post over at the Biblical Horizon’s blog about Ritual and Christianity (You’ll need to understand that “Christianity” is being used in the Leithartian “Against Christianity” sense).

One of the things he calls us to consider is:

If you have one cup, you have to drink as the cup is passed. Similarly, the bread was passed hand to hand and the disciples ate as soon as they broke off a piece. How many churches respect this? Precious few. A new ritual has been added of having everyone wait and then the pastor says something he’s made up and everyone eats and drinks together. Instead of each us of drinking and offering to die for the person next to us, we all drink in abstraction.

Interesting, but let’s look at the details given in the gospels on the Last Supper.

  • foot washing prior to the table (not part of the ritual per se, but there is every indication that it should be practiced: John 13:14 “If I then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet; ye also ought to wash one another’s feet”).
  • it is in the evening (in the Hebrew culture the day is reckoned from evening to evening so that this would be practiced at the beginning of the “day”).
  • it is practiced during a feast and therefore they are reclining around a table.
  • Jesus, taking and blessing the bread, broke it and gave it, saying “Take, eat; this is my body, which is given for you: do this in remembrance of me”.
  • Jesus, taking and giving thanks for the cup, gave it, saying “Drink ye all of it; for this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.”.

There are several things which we do not follow, but chief among these is that, generally, we do not have one cup. This is done for practical reasons, but it does seem fair to ask: what is more important sitting or one cup? Jordan says:

The elements are passed hand to hand, though the minister begins the ritual and speaks the words. How many churches do this? Denying the priesthood of all believers, the ideologists insist that each person be served individually by the minister.

We may value the hand to hand, but not the one cup. Those who visit a rail value the one cup, but not the hand to hand distribution. How do we decide? Is it purely a practical question?

Also, many churches break a loaf, but then hand out little raw croutons. Is the physical breaking of the bread we eat important?

But as for the question of waiting until the elements are handed out and eating together, the gospels are ambiguous on the timing, but the order is breaking, giving, then saying (here is a side to side comparison of the gospels). One thing I noticed is Mark 13:24-25: “And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it. And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.” At least in this case they drank and then he spoke, but perhaps he said “This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you” before the cup and then after their drinking added “shed for many“. In looking over this I can see there are all kinds of questions we need to pursue.

But his conclusion is powerful:

Let us be clear: Jesus did not say “Understand this” but “Do this.” It is the doing that is important. The Christianity churches, however, substitute ideology for obedience. Many refuse communion to people who do not have the right ideology about the Supper.

Amen to that.


2 thoughts on “The Order of the Eucharist

  1. I should mention that I don’t approve of going to the rail for communion. For reasons Jordan outlined, but also there doesn’t seem to be a distinction between the elements when practiced that way (meaning they serve the elements together).

  2. I don’t approve of going to the rail either, but I’ll do it for the sake of communing with the body. Better to commune with the body imperfectly than to protestantly refrain from communing, I say. I’m sure you agree – just thought I’d state it openly to clarify.

    You mentioned that the Last Supper was in the evening and practiced during a feast, around a table. I have so many fond memories of the old days when we had communion during evening worship, especially on Second Sundays, when we had it with a fellowship meal. At the risk of sounding too experiential, sentimental, nostalgic, just plain stupid over-the-top, and maybe even a bit superstitious – those Eucharists seemed so right, so intimate, like God was specially present and everyone was all the more receptive of / tuned into Him and one another, like the planets were aligned just right, and all was right in the world. I’m very grateful to your dad and the elders for the opportunity to have had such wonderful communion experiences.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s